Review of Season 2003 | Home | Results | K.O fINAL | M.C.C | Averages |

Given that the 1st team started the season on minus 20 points and the 2nd's a huge 40 points, this was a successful campaign. The obvious highlight was winning the Oxfordshire K.O final at the back end of August. The losing finalists went on to retain their Village K.O title at Lords, demonstration enough of our terrific  achievement.

Division 1 P W D L A B Pts Tired but extremely happy bunch
Aston Rowant 18 11 4 3 0 92 422
Oxford Downs 18 9 5 3 1 119 399
Banbury XX 18 11 2 3 2 34 384
Buckingham 18 7 6 4 1 139 359
Bourton  18 9 3 5 1 72 351
Challow 18 7 6 4 1 137 337
Shipton 17 5 5 7 0 142 292
Dinton 17 2 3 11 1 173 243
Sandford 18 2 5 10 1 147 217
Kimble 18 0 3 13 2 138 158

League form was patchy at times, especially early on, twice being defeated after making excellent scores batting first. During this same period against top teams we were showing too much deference, bowled tentatively and fielded indifferently. Second half  we looked a more confident, tight unit batting well and bowling  aggressively, all backed up by solid outfielding. The batting was held together by Julian Penney and Ashley Holznagel 1250 runs between them.  Highlights were Nigel Hill's 95 on an indifferent wicket against Sandford, Ashley's 128 against Bourton,  Julian's consistency, Neil Podbery's first half form and Will Clarke's classy batting in the second half of the season. We were short of a spinner for too many games, when either or especially both played we looked a much more balanced outfit. The bowling was spearheaded by Dave Slade who's 39 wickets was the biggest return since Dean Creedon was cracking ribs six seasons ago. Given that Dave took few of these in early season, he obviously had a wonderful spell later on.  Highlights were Dave's 8 against Aston Rowant and when he and Martin Turnbull bowled unchanged against Sandford routing them for under 80. It would be interesting to calculate, in the games in which we did not win, how many points were lost to dropped catches. Upwards of 25 probably, anyone out there got any ideas on that one?

Qualification 5 completed innings            Qualification 5 wickets

 

Name Inns Not Out Runs Highest Avge Name OVS. M'S Runs Wkts Avge Best
W.Clarke 6 1 252 81 50.40 A.Holznagel 64 7 268 16 16.75 5-24
A.Holznagel 18 2 738 128* 46.13 S.Watts 21 1 103 6 17.17 3-52
J.Penney 16 1 534 72 35.60 D.Slade 201 38 700 38 18.42 8-36
N.Hill 12 0 372 91 31.00 N.Hill 96 8 422 16 26.38 5-41
N.Podbery 17 2 405 85 27.00 M.Turnbull 130 10 615 23 26.74 5-58
M.Konschel 9 3 154 51* 25.66 M.Middleton 95 21 303 11 27.55 4-40
O.Dimbylow 10 3 154 40* 22.00 B.James 33 1 207 6 34.5 4-111
B.James 15 0 239 63 15.93
L.Houghton 13 0 176 30 13.54
M.Podbery 13 3 91 17 9.10
D.Slade 12 5 42 14* 6.00
M.Turnbull 11 6 23 7* 4.60

 

Finally, we some brave person has  to fill Ashley's boots for next season. 740 runs, 16 wickets and a commitment to the club that was a wonder to behold. Upwards of 30 hours a week coaching, practising and getting teams on the field. Instilling a different approach when batting second, gone the gung ho points or bust philosophy, do not give our opponents maximum became a priority. We chiselled out points and at the same time, denied our opponents their share. We wish him and the lovely Megan all the best and with their departure the knowledge that he will be an extremely hard act to follow.

The seconds had, if you'll forgive the cliché, a real roller coaster of a season. Superb team performances alongside a couple of dismal efforts, the nadir was the miserable three points gained in one game. In mitigation availability was an issue all season, this is probably best highlighted by our two games with Henley, the first we were all out for 47, the second, when our opposition needed to win for promotion, we scored 287 runs. The difference of 240 runs  cannot be just down to one wicket being akin to a goalmouth on Hackney Marsh and our own pristine strip. Answers on a postcard please. 

Division 4 P W D L A B Pts Oxon K.O Winners
Bic & NO 2nd 18 14 4 0 0 21 441
Henley 2nd 18 10 3 4 1 92 402
Long Marston 18 9 4 4 1 109 389
Buckghm 2nd 18 8 5 5 0 113 353
Wallingford 18 8 4 5 1 88 338
Didcot 18 6 4 7 1 134 324
Brackley 18 2 6 9 1 211 281
*Challow 2nd 18 6 4 7 1 119 269
Wendover 18 1 5 10 2 156 206
Tiddingtn 2nd 18 0 3 13 2 127 147

Figures are not available at this moment but it is apparent that no one dominated the batting, no one to get 500 runs and hold things together. The only hundred came from Will Clarke and he was on loan from the 1st X1! The long term injury of Tim Beauzeval was a big blow, but Phil Cox, Ed Ekins and Owen Dimbylow carried the attack along, but like the other teams, lack of a spinner was fundamental. Owen had the seasons best figures 6-60. The absence of Clive was  crucial, looking at his performances when he played, it is apparent that he is still pivotal as the teams premier all-rounder.

For the 3rd XI, the season turned out to be a huge disappointment, pushing for promotion for most of the year, whipping boys for the last five games. At least the reasons for this are blindingly obvious, whether the cause of this slump in form will be addressed is another matter. With the obvious demands  from above, the club has a simple question to ask of itself, short term expediency or an attempt  to support the 3rd XI  in a way which does not  expose very young cricketers to absolute drubbings. Given the importance of not compromising the 2nd XI's competitiveness it is an extremely difficult equation to balance, but at the moment not enough support is being directed towards the 3rd XI youngsters.  The batting was held together by Ted Heape, Alan Mercer and Justin Penrose, the bowling was too young by half. Harry Hunter and Steve Kennedy McGregor showed promise and the competitive edge vital to improvement. Unavailability contributed as well, Colin Mercer (boozing around the fleshpots of Europe) and Duncan Woolloff who's fingers are more brittle than poppa dums were the two most missed. 

 

Averages soon to appear.

back to top ^